Camellia Grace Learn Article #17
Divorce
Advertisement for a popular household glue in the late 19th century where the child is seen gluing their motherโs dress down.
(1870-1900) Egyptian Tenexine, with a bottle of Tenexine in the house, divorce is absolutely impossible. (Digital Public Library of America)
Marriage has been a building block of society for many centuries and a milestone that has been celebrated with anticipation. However, there are times when those unions do not create a happy partnership and divorce enters the discussion. During the Gilded Age, divorce was less prevalent than it is currently in our society, but it was a period in our countryโs history when divorce rates were increasing and faster than they were in Europe. Despite this, divorce was still a topic rife with controversy and stigma.
During the 19th century, marriage was widely viewed as a permanent institution and a building block of family, religion and society. Divorce often was seen as a failure and socially shameful as one broke with the traditional pattern of life. However, divorce was legal and available if the โinjured partyโ could prove under legally recognized grounds that a divorce was necessary. The legal grounds varied from state to state but the most common were adultery, abandonment, extreme cruelty and chronic drunkenness. This is referred to as fault-based divorce where one party must be proven at fault.
The stigma surrounding divorce could be harsh for women. Traditional gender expectations emphasized marriage, motherhood, domesticity, and female obedience. A divorced woman could be judged as having failed regardless of the circumstances that led to divorce. Men were also more likely to be granted divorces than women when bringing similar cases before a court. A man who had a mistress or intimate relationships with other women was not punished as harshly as a woman who did the same. Again, women were held to a higher standard.
Women in general were also at a disadvantage legally as laws put husbands in greater control over property and children and left women with no independent legal status. Marriage and divorce law reform became a platform for some womenโs rights activists who argued change was needed to give women greater legal protection and independence. Their goals were to broaden the grounds for divorce, grant women access and custody of their children, and allow women the right to own property and control their wages.
Social class was also a large determining factor in oneโs ability to obtain a divorce. Wealthy Americans had greater access to lawyers, court proceedings, travel, and the financial resources to establish residency in states with more lenient divorce laws. However, divorce was not exclusively an upper-class privilege. By the late 19th century, working-class and middle-class Americans were also increasingly represented in divorce courts, although the financial burden of pursuing a divorce could make the process more difficult for poorer individuals. This was especially true for women who did not have money or resources of their own separate from their husbands.
One of the most famous divorces of the Gilded Age was that of William Kissam Vanderbilt and Alva Vanderbilt. William was Cornelius Vanderbiltโs grandson and the two were married in 1875. However, the marriage was not a happy one. William was habitually unfaithful to Alva, but infidelity in the upper class among men was not unheard of and was not condemned socially if it was discreet. This did not sit well with Alva, who always pushed against archaic notions of society. In early 1894 Alva asked for a divorce, against the advice of family, friends and legal counsel. Divorce among the upper elite was not common and was scandalous and subject to very public scrutiny, not to mention the possibility of loss of money. Despite this, Alva was granted a divorce in March of 1894 and received an unprecedented settlement of over $10 million, custody of her children and ownership of multiple residences.
Divorce in Gilded Age America was happening with more frequency but was still socially sensitive. It was believed marriage should last a lifetime, and divorce would damage your reputation and that of your family. Yet, changing laws, womenโs rights activism and famous divorces such as Alva Vanderbiltโs showed that traditional attitudes were starting to be challenged.
Inheritance Law in the 19th Century
During the 19th century, U.S. inheritance laws had gradually become more equal among genders than they had previously. Influenced by English common law, early American laws often favored male heirs, but by the start of the 1800s most states had abandoned primogeniture, or the preference of eldest sons inheriting, and divided property more equally among children, including daughters.
Married women, however, remained overlooked in inheritance law. Women were subject to an old legal law doctrine called coverture. Coverture was inherited from English common law and stated that when a woman married a man her legal identity was merged with and absorbed into her husbandโs. This meant that a married woman could not own real estate, own her own wages, sign contracts, or draft wills without her husbandโs consent. Coverture also gave the husband exclusive legal custody rights to any children. In regard to inheritance, this meant that if a woman came into a marriage owning inherited property or wealth, that property or wealth would then become her husbandโs.
Beginning in the mid 19th century, states started passing Married Women Property Acts. New Yorkโs 1848 law, for example, protected married womenโs inherited property from their husbandโs control and debt. Western states also adopted community-property systems, giving wives rights to property acquired during marriage
By the end of the century, more states recognized married womenโs ability to control, inherit, and leave property through wills. Although inequality continued, these reforms weakened traditional legal restrictions and helped create a fairer inheritance system.
Employment for Women
During the Gilded Age, the percentage of women finding employment outside of the home increased to 21% in 1900, up from 15% in 1870. Despite the increase in working women, the job opportunities for women were limited and they were excluded from many male-dominated professions. For middle and upper-class women, it was seen as favorable to not have to work and they were expected to marry, raise children, and manage the household. For the unmarried and working-class women, the economic need was much greater to seek work, but their choices were restricted to occupations considered appropriate for women.
Many women worked as domestic servants, caring for children, cooking, cleaning or performing other household duties. Others found employment in textile mills, factories, laundries and sweatshops. With the rapid economic and capital growth of the gilded age, cities and business expanded which brought more employment opportunities for women in the form of teachers, nurses, typists, stenographers, telephone operators and shop clerks. But still, these jobs were considered appropriate and respectable for women as they were adjacent to the idea of women as caretakers and producers of goods.
Three women working in a shoe factory โ Lynn, Massachusetts.
Johnston, Frances Benjamin. Photograph, c. 1895. Library of Congress
The pay gap between men and women was quite vast. Women were paid significantly less than men for doing the same job. On average, women were paid about half as much as men. For industrial or factory work, men averaged about $500 to $564 a year in 1890, while women averaged about $200 to $300. Again, men were more valued as the โbreadwinnersโ for their families, while women werenโt encouraged to stay in the workforce long-term and to leave if they married or had children. Their contributions were not as valued. This also limited their opportunities for advancement or increasing their potential wage earnings.
By the end of the Gilded Age, the increased participation of women in the workforce was starting to challenge the ideas of the traditional roles of women and helped to strengthen later movements for economic and social equality. Though today the pay gap for women has decreased and the opportunities for women have increased immensely, the disparities still exist and equality in employment is still a struggle being fought today.
Other Words, People and Phrases:
Je ne sais quoi: a French phrase used to mean an appealing quality that canโt be described or named easily
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_in_the_United_States
https://shirleendavies.com/divorce-in-the-19th-century/
https://mollybrown.org/women-divorce-high-society/
https://www.history.com/articles/divorce-timeline-america
https://thestoryexchange.org/the-gilded-age-delved-into-divorce-stigma-which-persists-today/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_Women's_Property_Acts_in_the_United_States
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCUsF3cWllQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alva_Belmont
https://loc.gov/resource/llglrd.2014504249/?pdfPage=15
https://teachinglegalhistory.unl.edu/s/oer/item/2213
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2744&context=faculty_publications
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_Women%27s_Property_Acts_in_the_United_States
https://www.womenshistory.org/articles/coverture-word-you-probably-dont-know-should
https://www.hhhistory.com/2024/11/women-and-inheritance-in-late-1800s.html
https://www.thoughtco.com/property-rights-of-women-3529578
https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/00089/america_work.html
https://www.loc.gov/resource/gdcmassbookdig.womenwageearners00camp/?st=pdf&pdfPage=7
https://www.nps.gov/klgo/learn/historyculture/women1890s.htm
https://sites.ecu.edu/genderpoliticsculture/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/870/2011/03/Cordery.pdf
https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/pricesandwages/1870-1879#sex